RAI World, RAI, Rim ITALIAN SOURCES – DOCUMENTS ON MASSACRE OF SERBS IN DALMATIA, LIKA AND KNINSKA KRAJINA (1941 – 1943) The role of Italian Army on the territory of the former Kingdom of Yugoslavia has been unjustly neglected even in the Italian historiography itself. The entry, deployment and actions of 2nd Army in Istria and Dalmatia – ordered and executed on 11 April, 1941 at 12:00pm – deserves more detailed study, because in that sector Italian units found themselves in a complex wartime and political situation unlike history has ever seen. The Italians carefully monitored and recorded the events and by that gave support to many complex historical truths

Jasenovac Board of the Serbian Orthodox Church, Jerusalem MEMOIRS, AUTOBIOGRAPHIES AND BIOGRAPHIES OF MEMBERS OF ALLIED MISSIONS IN OCCUPIED YUGOSLAVIA AS SOURCES OF RESEARCH OF 1941 AND JADOVNO The rich literature of diaries or autobiographical texts of members of Allied missions in the occupied Yugoslavia, as well as their biographies, has almost been unused in terms of research of sufferings in the Second World War in Yugoslavia. Allied missions were present in Yugoslavia already in late 1941 and had the opportunity, whether personally or through testimonies and documents, to witness the terrible suffering of some structures of the Yugoslav population during the war. Because of that their testimonies are invaluable.

Simon Wiesenthal Center, Jerusalem IMPORTANCE OF THE POST-HOLOCAUST JUSTICE IN THE EAST EUROPE AFTER THE FALL OF COMMUNISM The lecture will deal with the significance of prosecuting Nazi war criminals and collaborators in post-Communist Europe. It will describe the unique aspects of the collaboration with the Third Reich in the countries which were part of the Soviet Union or under Communist rule from the end of World War II until 1989, emphasizing the lethal nature of such collaboration, which unlike the situation elsewhere in Europe, included active participation in mass murder. Bringing these war criminals to justice has proven to be one of the most difficult, if not the most difficult, of the six

University of Vienna WAR OF REMEMBERANCE IN POST-YUGOSLAV REGION Without any doubt we could say that individuals and groups use memories of past for present purposes, they remember only those events that they could fit into their own image of themselves or the group. So already in 1980-ties in (Western) Europe, after decades of suppression, the Holocaust became the focus of memories of the Second World War. The extermination of European Jews is considered to be a common experience from which Europe learned and created new structures in order to prevent something like that from happening in the future. At the same time in Eastern and Southeast Europe the history

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem MEMORY AS IDEOLOGY IN CHANGING SOCIETIES  -“Never again” as a paradigm for Holocaust Memory – “It is the manipulation of history rather than emotion through architecture of monuments that is troubling. When history is not understood it is more likely to be repeated.” The modern researchers continuously attempt to bridge between the history and collective memories of the Jews and the non-Jewish communities, coexistent in a common landscape. This is not an easy task, mainly for the fundamental differences between history and memory: whereas history attempts to reconstruct the past on the basis of all the data at hand by means of critical analysis, memory

Union of Jewish Communities of Serbia, Belgrade MEMORY IS NOT ENOUGH MEMORY: There is individual, the personal memory primarily of all those who survived concentration and death camps. Unfortunately, already tomorrow none of the surviving camp inmates are going to be amongst us. There is also a public memory such as international remembrance days, when a state remembers victims and terrible crimes once a year (through speeches made by representatives of authorities). That public memorialisation is in fact a part of political obligations of states. States submit annual reports about those memorial days saying that they have successfully marked them and by that fulfilled their obligation. To public memorialisation also

Музеј жртава геноцида, Београд ЖРТВЕ РАТА 1941-1945. РОЂЕНЕ НА ПОДРУЧЈУ БОСАНСКЕ КРАЈИНЕ ПРЕМА ДО САДА ИЗВРШЕНОЈ РЕВИЗИЈИ ПОПИСА ИЗ 1964. ГОДИНЕ С ПОСЕБНИМ ОСВРТОМ НА СТРАДАЊЕ СТАРИЈИХ ЛИЦА И СТРАДАЊЕ У ЛОГОРУ ЈАДОВНО Про­стор ко­ји обрађујемо чини 11,23% простора НДХ и пре­ма по­пи­су из 1931. го­ди­не има 659.701 ста­нов­ни­ка, од че­га је 63,39% пра­во­слав­не, 12,01% ри­мо­ка­то­лич­ке, 23,84% ислам­ске ве­ро­и­спо­ве­сти и оста­ли 0,76%, а  претпостављени број становништва 1941. го­ди­не износи 804.835, што представља 12,78% претпостављеног броја становника НДХ (1941. није вршен попис становништва). На овом про­сто­ру еви­ден­ти­ра­но је 105.624 смрт­но стра­да­лих ли­ца, што чи­ни 23,16%  еви­ден­ти­ра­них жр­та­ва у НДХ, и 13,12%   прет­по­ста­вље­ног ста­нов­ни­штва 1941. го­ди­не овог под­руч­ја (број еви­ден­ти­ра­них жр­та­ва у

Међународна комисиjа за истину о Јасеновцу, Меjнашаф СОЦИЈАЛНО-ПСИХОЛОШКИ АСПЕКТИ ФЕНОМЕНА ГЕНОЦИДА У СВЕТЛУ „ТЕОРИЈЕ ДЕФИНИЦИОНИЗМА“ Узурпирање власти над дефинициjама са тежњом постизања jедног монопола над истима, од стране центара политичке моћи, оличених у државним или парадржавним структурама jе наjделотворниjи инструмент дотичних центара политичке моћи и истовремено, погонска снага прогреса и регреса у сегментарном и глобалном развоjу људског друштва. Раст политичке моћи jе искуствено директно пропорционалан опадању привржености императиву етике људског друштва. Тиме jе узурпирање власти над дефинициjама са-одлучуjући каузални и пратећи фактор и свих социjалних девиjациjа историjе човечанства. (Теориjа дефиниционизма) Време геноцида jе jедна врста „ванредног стања“ у социjално-психолошком погледу и jедна битна детерминанта тог времена jе jедно – на

Колеџ Итака, Њујорк ПРЕЖИВЈЕЛО ДИЈЕТЕ ЛОГОРАШ – ЛИЧНО СЈЕЋАЊЕ И ПРЕНЕСЕНО ИСКУСТВО Овај рад описује лично сјећање шездесетдвогодишњег човјека који је изгубио већину своје породице у холокаусту почињеном од Хрвата (многи од њих су умрли у комплексу Јадовно укључујући Слану и Карлобаг). Родитељи јединог дјетета који су изгубили своје вољено послије рата емигрирали су у Израел, али никада нису говорили о том искуству тако да је кућа била пуна тешког осјећаја кривице, стида и дубоке туге. Тек је новембра 2005. године неки унутрашњи зов навео аутора да сазна шта се десило. У то вријеме на интернету није било информација и све што се знало о острву Паг је да је